全部
← Back to Squawk list
Newly captured photo shows Russia's new badass shark stealth fighter
A new photo captured by Artyom Anikeev shows Russia's new Sukhoi T-50 stealth fighter—America's F-22 Raptor's nemesis. According to The Aviationist, its new camouflage—inspired by a typical white tip Red Sea's shark—will make it look "as a rhomboidal shaped aircraft, smaller than the actual airplane" from a distance. (sploid.gizmodo.com) 更多...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
I like it...but then again nothing surprises me about RUSSIAN AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY ...they definitely seem to copy other's ,but they seem to do right again & again!!
looks like the f-22. and Russia pilot's suck lol
Anyone who underestimates Russian fighter designs hasn't 1, studied them or 2, been paying attention (SU-27 Family ... HELLO !).
The Russians build designs to suit THEIR needs and do it at less cost (with fewer bells & whistles) than we do then sell slightly "dumbed down" versions to offset the cost and increase the numbers of the "home design" they buy for themselves.
The PAK_FA design is being developed as an Air Superiority Fighter with secondary multi mission capabilities similar to the F-22, the F-35 is a multi role design that can handle itself in the air to air role but it is not now and never was intended to be an Air Superiority fighter.
One thing you can be sure of, whatever version of the PAK-FA design is chosen and goes into production, it will be a potent fighter and you can bet they'll build a lot more than 188 of them unlike the F-22.
And you can say what you like about unmanned aircraft, but manned aircraft are going to be around for a long long time to come.
The (risk averse) US has a fascination with UAVs, but most of the rest of the world still believes in 2 eyes looking out of a cockpit.
BTW, the Russians use a 3D (round) type of Trust Vectoring nozzle instead of the rectangular one used on the F-22, the F-35 does not have T.V. per se, the F-35B uses a downward deflecting nozzle for STO/VTOL operations.
The Russians build designs to suit THEIR needs and do it at less cost (with fewer bells & whistles) than we do then sell slightly "dumbed down" versions to offset the cost and increase the numbers of the "home design" they buy for themselves.
The PAK_FA design is being developed as an Air Superiority Fighter with secondary multi mission capabilities similar to the F-22, the F-35 is a multi role design that can handle itself in the air to air role but it is not now and never was intended to be an Air Superiority fighter.
One thing you can be sure of, whatever version of the PAK-FA design is chosen and goes into production, it will be a potent fighter and you can bet they'll build a lot more than 188 of them unlike the F-22.
And you can say what you like about unmanned aircraft, but manned aircraft are going to be around for a long long time to come.
The (risk averse) US has a fascination with UAVs, but most of the rest of the world still believes in 2 eyes looking out of a cockpit.
BTW, the Russians use a 3D (round) type of Trust Vectoring nozzle instead of the rectangular one used on the F-22, the F-35 does not have T.V. per se, the F-35B uses a downward deflecting nozzle for STO/VTOL operations.
[This poster has been suspended.]
You obviously haven't met any or seen them fly, I have, they're good, damned good in their own equipment.
Never underestimate your opponent.
Never underestimate your opponent.
What makes you say that? What is it about being born in Russia that makes one less likely to be able to fly an airplane competently?
And saying that an airplane's design doesn't matter is foolish. Oh, wait. Who am I talking to?
And saying that an airplane's design doesn't matter is foolish. Oh, wait. Who am I talking to?
[This poster has been suspended.]
heck we can barely afford to train like US pilots...lol
The other thing every fan of Russian and Chinese aircraft design need to consider is this: We have aircraft currently flying that will not be acknowledged until the middle of the next decade. This is a case of what you don't know, and therefore cannot copy, can and will kill you.
Lastly, for those who believe an aircraft must be manned in order for it to be lethal, the software, represented by the man, or woman, in the cockpit, is the most fragile part of the weapons system. If you simply remove the pilot from the aircraft, you increase the ability and agility of the aircraft far beyond what any manned aircraft is capable of. Imagine an aircraft designed to operate at over 10 G's, but limited by the inability of a pilot to sustain prolonged high G maneuvers? You severely restrict the operational capabilities of the aircraft in order to accommodate the pilot. Give a kid a joy stick, some fancy camera angles and remote control and you dominate every piloted aircraft in the sky. Even fancy new copied aircraft with fancy new paint jobs.