Back to Squawk list
  • 13

FAA: Auto Detailers Not Suited To Clean Aircraft

提交时间:
 
While the FAA considers the physical act of washing an aircraft, by itself, as neither maintenance nor preventive maintenance, the agency is warning aircraft operators (http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/airline_safety/info/all_infos/media/2016/InFO16005.pdf) about using auto detailing companies to perform this task, since they cannot ensure compliance with maintenance-related procedures that are part of the washing process. (www.ainonline.com) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


SmokedChops
SmokedChops 6
it is called training, folks. If you think the guy washing your King-Air is an A&P, ooops. Does the FAA really believe there is no training possible for a detailer? No, I don't want little 'Skippy' on his first summer job at the FBO washing/waxing my ship - unless he has been shown how to do it. Training, 'here is what you do, here is what you don't do' it is not that complicated.
carlsonj
James Carlson 1
Of course not. If you read the actual InFO that was published, they're just warning owners that untrained workers might end up doing harm even on something as innocuous-looking as giving the ship a bath, and that proper maintenance (where required) is something that needs to be logged.

If you already knew this, then good for you! If you didn't, then read the InFO.

Seems like perfectly reasonable and good advice ... unless, of course, you're one of those strange commenters here with a political ax to grind. In that case, don't bother; we've already heard that the President is to blame for all things, various and sundry, and don't really need to hear it again.
ADXbear
ADXbear 1
What too much regulations.. and with Hillary looking like the next Prez.. look out.. we wont be able to take a crap without being checkout on the crapper model..
canuck44
canuck44 1
I see a whole new opportunity to create a new federal bureaucracy to establish and codify regulations pertaining to the washing and polishing of A/C. This of course would demonstrate the need for an enforcement arm....with their own SWAT Team.
bentwing60
bentwing60 1
FAA personnel only slightly more qualified!
zennermd
zennermd 0
Does anyone else take issue with how far the FAA is reaching with this one? I kind of understand, they could break a safety pin, etc. but as a line specialist, I washed and waxed all the time with no special training or anything of the sort. How is this any different?
linbb
linbb 4
And hopefully know where places are you do not want to clog with wax like the static port, stall warning vane and such. They do not know and some never have even been around an AC to know those areas along with what not to do in the intake of an engine.
They do not hire people always for there knowledge but for body's to do the work they can also damage components such as antennas and control surfaces. You might not see the damage but find out when airborne, does that strike a note of question I hope.
zennermd
zennermd 2
That is the same thing with linemen at an FBO, while I knew what and what not to do as a pilot, there were many times people asked us to wash or wax their airplane without ever making sure we knew what we were doing. They just assumed (incorrectly) we were supposed to know what we could and couldn't do. While I was trained well, I am guessing that isn't always the case and I am guessing there are many FBO linemen out there that would pose the same risk, if not greater than having a detailing shop perform the work. In short, I suppose what I am saying is... If I the pilot, explain and teach/show an auto detailer how to perform the work, then why can I not have them clean my aircraft?

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

登录

还没有帐户吗? 现在就注册(免费),设置诸多自定义功能、航班提醒等等!
您知道FlightAware航班跟踪是由广告支持吗?
通过允许展示来自FlightAware.com的广告,您可以帮助我们使FlightAware保持免费。我们努力使我们的广告保持相关性,同时不显突兀,以创造一流的体验。在FlightAware上将广告加入白名单快捷而简单,或者请您考虑选择我们的高级帐户.
退出