64 投票數 (4.86 平均) 和 7,473 浏览  

— —
/images/icons/csMagGlass.png 中等 / 大图 / 全尺寸

— —

提交时间:

Comments

Please log in or register to post a comment.

Colton Fletcher
another good one!
Anthony Holding
Excellent photo please give information on aircraft and where
Colin Seftel
Anthony, that's a B-29 N69972, one of only two still airworthy. Details here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doc_(aircraft)
foto yang bagus... mantap
STEPHEN FURTAK
So frickin CLEAN! Does it fly? ;)
rbt schaffer
That's not an airplane,,, That is a piece of ART .... and a lot of hard work
Jeff Free
I'm so glad to see "Doc" out and about! I've followed the progress of this big bird for years. It's a fantastic story. Great picture and thanks for sharing.
John Lease
A lot of elbow grease has gone into that air craft for sure!
a mentor
oompleted post WWII, so it's not 100% B-29 ... eg: no turrets.
David Seider
@ a mentor: "Doc" is indeed a full-fledged 100% Boeing - Wichita B-29-70-BW Superfortress. According to Wikipedia (see Colin Seftel's post, above), this aircraft was given USAAF Serial Number 44-69972. Doc was built in 1944 and delivered to the USAAF in March 1945 (the war in the Pacific still had ~5 months to play out).

Doc did not see combat, but (not knowing for certain, this is an informed guess on my part) there is no reason to believe that construction of this frame - during the war - did not include the gun turrets and aiming station blisters. It is reasonable to believe that these were removed at some point in Doc's long career. Back to Wikipedia: There were 311 B-29 airframes built without turrets, but these were built by Bell - Atlanta.

Cheers!
john cook
And you'll notice no turrets on Enola Gay.
You say she's not 100% B-29????
Greg Brosius
Towards the end of the war, General Lemay had most if not all defensive armament removed to increase bomb load. There wasn't much need for it by then, considering Japan's lack of fighter defense, and the Mustang escort's protection.
a mentor
sorry but i've lost the documentation re Doc being built from day one w/o turrets.
I think @Greg is spot on in that by late '45, they were considered unnecessary.

And I didn't say she's NOT a -29 -- just not as originally designed.
serge LOTH
Thanks to all these people maintaining all these old ladies everywhere in the world.. They work for human history..

登录

还没有帐户吗? 现在就注册(免费),设置诸多自定义功能、航班提醒等等!
本网站使用cookie。您使用并继续浏览本网站,即表示您接受这一点。
退出
您知道FlightAware航班跟踪是由广告支持吗?
通过允许展示来自FlightAware.com的广告,您可以帮助我们使FlightAware保持免费。我们努力使我们的广告保持相关性,同时不显突兀,以创造一流的体验。在FlightAware上将广告加入白名单快捷而简单,或者请您考虑选择我们的高级帐户.
退出