← Back to Squawk list

102

‘Aggressive’ passenger may have to pay plane’s fuel bill after causing emergency landing

提交时间：2 年以前

A Canadian man may be charged $17,450 after his drunken and disorderly behavior caused the airplane to make an emergency return to the airport while accompanied by two F-15 U.S. Air Force jets. (www.foxnews.com) 更多...

76 条会员评论

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Sharon Cockrell 2 年以前 1

Until the issue of letting people drink as much as they want before and during flights is addressed, this will continue. It’s amazing to me that airlines are willing to let passengers drink in the quantities they do, and then are surprised when they become belligerent and disruptive- at times even life-threatening. There is fault to be shared all the way around.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Dennis Stockton 2 年以前 1

The airlines have same cavalier attitude about passengers bringing into the cabin and trying to fit into the overhead bins luggage that should be checked

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

mike watts 2 年以前 0

The response was an over-reaction - he obviously did not present an actual physical threat. We are all just scared shitless now. It is BS to try to bill the passenger. Things are never perfect in any business or activity and some allowance for the unusual or the abnormal must be made.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

patrick baker 2 年以前 1

really though, this guy is today's winner of the Aztec Lucky Virgin contest. An example has to be made, monetary and confinement, some of each. Then watch and see less of this crap....

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

patrick baker 2 年以前 1

i hate to side with airline management, BUT, these costs reflect some portion of actual damages, and the passenger is logically and legally responsible. Maybe the guy is clastrophobic.... that would excuse it in my book.....

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

ken young 2 年以前 1

Clastrophobia is no excuse. The reason is everyone knows their fears and foibles before hand.
So, no. No pass for this guy.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Geoff Arkley 2 年以前 1

Lot of comments but has anybody mentioned "Air Marshall".
A quick bonk on the back of the head with a 3 D-Cell maglight could have saved a ton of grief here.
No bullet exiting the pressurised hull. Clean solution?

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Claude Monte 2 年以前 1

Hey you, ever thought that BEFORE you get on such a list, you must make a fool of yourself once ?
Or do you think that all the future stupid acting flyers are known BEFORE they board ?

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Carl Labecki 2 年以前 1

The guy got off very light. Absolutely he should pay the 17 grand plus a huge fine and be banned from flying forever. I see his kind all the time when travelling to the Caribbean and have even gotten some of them arrested at the end destination. Sunwing should have gone onto to Cuba and let the jerk rot in a Cuban jail cell. Big thing is to give him lots of jail time to think about just how stupid he is.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Richard Loven 2 年以前 1

The Airlines should have bouncers on their planes. The people that act up then could be thrown out the door.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

n9341c 2 年以前 1

They do. They are called "pilots".

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

ken young 2 年以前 1

Back in the day before air carriers relaxed their standards for pilot recruitment. most if not all flight crew were military veterans. These guys could handle most rowdy passengers.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Dennis Stockton 2 年以前 -3

Bill Trudeau for the entire costs.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

matt jensen 2 年以前 1

A breathalyser test would have kept him off the jet

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Jim Drummond 2 年以前 0

To right take his passport for a year then he can't get access to air travel

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

VICTOR TORRES 2 年以前 1

May he receive what is deserving for the wrong committed .

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Leon Artac 2 年以前 1

Bar him from flying on any airline in North America. If that doesn't work, push him out at 10,000 ft.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

toolguy105 2 年以前 1

Yes make him pay for the fuel burned and dumped because of his behavior. Maybe if people see the consequences of there action s they will think twice about starting the vacation part in the airport bar.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

AWAAlum 2 年以前 1

That's assuming someone who would behave this way would be thoughtful enough. Doubtful.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Linda Nitzschke 2 年以前 -3

Being from Canada, the guy was probably mad cuz someone referred to him using the "wrong" pronoun.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

TWA55 2 年以前 1

I lay odds this never happens. It's a little late to try to put Pandora back.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

John Perinbam 2 年以前 1

Should be paying more than that, considering it was deemed necessary to fly 2 F-15s.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Lucio DiLoreto 2 年以前 2

Why did they let him on the airplane to begin with?

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

John A. Johnson 2 年以前 -2

Of course the bottom line is this person should be executed - probably would be in Cuba - but at the very least he is responsible for every delayed and inconvenienced passenger's expenses and time and every one of them has a valid case against him.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Sam Johnson 2 年以前 2

Perhaps we should start flying the 727 again. Drop down to 10,000 ft, open the aft steps and push his dumb butt out.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

AWAAlum 2 年以前 6

Next thing we know, a small "holding cell" will be included in the cabin to alleviate flights having to divert. Hmmm - the way things seem to be going, that may not be such a bad idea.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

joel wiley 2 年以前 2

Call it a 'time-out room'. Could be used for outrageous actions of juveniles of all ages.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Clay Kahai 2 年以前 2

Hmmm! I kinda like that “holding cell n the cabin” idea!

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Herbert Swain 2 年以前 3

Stewardess.... My wife has had too much to drink, please lock her up!

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Mike Mohle 2 年以前 2

In the cargo hold....

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Warren Craycroft 2 年以前 1

unpressurized ...

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Linda Nitzschke 2 年以前 1

That, or hand him a parachute.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Don Whyte 2 年以前 3

or not

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Greg S 2 年以前 4

The article says he is planning on declaring bankruptcy. Sadly, after all is said and done I doubt he'll pay much if anything.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Redentor Pineda 2 年以前 1

Lock him up in lieu of payment.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

joel wiley 2 年以前 2

Tack it on as a student loan - those cannot be discharged in backruptcy for some odd reason.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Ed Merriam 2 年以前 1

"MBNA Joe" Biden (so "odd reason" is apt)

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Robert Timberlake 2 年以前 1

Yet if he does declare then he can only do it once every 7 years. So at least we won't have to deal with this asshole for another 7 years.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Kate Jacques 2 年以前 3

“You made the messs...YOU clean it up..”. Applies to both children and adults. But kids are nicer.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

John Wyer 2 年以前 11

It's about time there are consequences for this kind of behavior. A small step in the right direction.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

John G 2 年以前 5

How on earth could two fighter jets possibly assist an aircraft with an unruly passenger on board?

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Barry McClung 2 年以前 4

They are scrambled in case it is not an isolated mingebag passenger, but a coordinated effort to hijack, and use the aircraft as a weapon, ala 9/11.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

30west 2 年以前 1

And should that happen as Barry describes, the fighters are there to destroy (i.e. shoot down) the jet before it can consumate the terrorist act.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Graham Ge 2 年以前 27

Airlines should unite and create a blacklist, passengers such as this idiot should never be allowed to fly again. It wouldnt take long for word to get around.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Mike Mohle 2 年以前 1

They can take the bus!

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Pete Schecter 2 年以前 3

those lists already exist and they are shared...

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Redentor Pineda 2 年以前 1

How come it still happening if list do exist? List on the brick wall maybe.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Cade foster 2 年以前 4

That would be really great but some lawyer will invent some pathetic defense and that drunken looser will end up being paid.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

chalet 2 年以前 9

Wait a minute, before jumping to conclusions the question is: was he drunk before boarding, if so then the airport authorities and the airline agents should have prevented him from boarding and handed him over the poice if warranted. Now if in spite of being drunk they let him aboard then the blame is somebody else's. Now I for one thik that if a passenger gets drunk while airborne and acts in an unfit manner, then he should be wrestled down by the cabin crew, duct tape him hands and mouth alright, and CONTINUE FLYING to destination.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

ken young 2 年以前 1

Ha ha.Yep. A Cuban jail would be a fitting place for this miscreant

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

WhiteKnight77 2 年以前 2

There was a time where I would invariably be quite lit when getting on a plane, and drink more while on-board. Not everyone creates a problem while inebriated. For me, it was a way to get rest on those long flights overseas.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Jeff Carey 2 年以前 1

I Agree

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Greg S 2 年以前 1

Not everybody who is drunk can be "spotted" by ground agents. And I'm not sure that merely being drunk is grounds to deny boarding. You only have to be able to follow flight attendant's instructions. Finally, they don't test passengers to see if they can be allowed to board. Whether he was drunk before or after he boarded it's still his responsibility. We'd certainly prefer to have ground personnel identify problem passengers before they board, but it's unrealistic to expect much success in there.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

robin cooper 2 年以前 3

and hand him over to cuban authorities a few months in a cuban jail would cure him!!!!

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

DAVID MCKIE 2 年以前 14

Another case of how to make an instant asshole--just add alcohol!! Yes he should pay. Same goes for the 5 Brits who forced a plane to land in Winnipeg recently. Zero tolerance is the only message these idiots understand.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Braniff77 2 年以前 4

and yet, airports keep adding more places inside the terminal to get alcohol. Newark Terminal C no longer has moving walkways in at least one of the concourses, and it's now basically a terminal-long bar.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

n9341c 2 年以前 1

It has less to do with alcohol than it does psychological fitness. I'm becoming more and more convinced that airlines should demand passengers produce and file a "psychological fitness to fly" that is signed off by their primary care physician and be on file BEFORE being allowed to purchase a ticket. Times are different. People are nuts. This is getting ridiculous. Clearly people are flying on airplanes that should NOT be allowed to fly or be in contained, close proximity to others for any extended period.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Bob Roehrer 2 年以前 1

Just like all good ideas that haven't been thought thru: who's going to pay for all that adminstrative affort?

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

joel wiley 2 年以前 1

Call it a National Security issue, assign it to DOD, place funds with DOD that can then be diverted to shore up the FUP-35 program. /s

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Mike Mohle 2 年以前 2

Airports are funded with alcohol $$$.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Ian Roxburgh 2 年以前 19

....and yet again, why should the vast majority of us who drink alcohol responsibly be deprived of the facilities to do so - at the airport or on board - simply to accommodate those who don’t or won’t? I deplore this tendency to blame everyone and everything rather than the culprit. No question in my mind, he should have to pay the FULL cost of the diversion. One caveat here; IF the ground staff let him on board, aware that he was likely to cause disruption, then they should shoulder some of the blame but this is not always obvious at the time.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

WeatherWise 2 年以前 2

...and yet again...how many drinks are there in "responsible"? How about flying...or anything else for that matter...SOBER? Or is that just out of the realm of possibility?

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Bob Roehrer 2 年以前 2

Amen. How about toking responsibly, isn't that the same as drinking responsibly. I'd rather no one do either on my airplane, thank you very much. further, one person's idea of "responsibly" can be worlds apart from the next persons!

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Pierre Letourneau 2 年以前 1

I am wondering why the two U.S. F-15 escorted the plane through Canadian airspace.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Leon Artac 2 年以前 1

Probably requested by Canadian Govt.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

30west 2 年以前 10

NORAD has operational control of all U.S. and Canadian air defense assets to use for defending the airspace of both countries. Those assets respond to threats as directed by NORAD.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Jay Deet 2 年以前 1

Thank you; did not know that.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Andy Cruickshank 2 年以前 5

Don't be a dick.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

sparkie624 2 年以前 27

That is not near the cost of the Diversion and add a Fighter Jet escort to boot... He should have to pay more like 50 to $75,000 or more. It costs about $20,000 an hour for a fighter jet alone and they had 2 not to mention the airline costs.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Shenghao Han 2 年以前 56

That is about 20%-30% of actual cost for diverting, overtime, and put the others on other flights, let alone those missed vacation plans... Maybe if we make all unruly passenger pay the actual cost, they will be less unruly.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

Karl Poehlmann 2 年以前 2

He is bankrupt they never get a dime out of him

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

mdburd 2 年以前 1

Actually, if he's filed before the judge rules, this would be post bankruptcy--would it not??

Unless he's using the filing as sheer prophylaxis--in case of the ruling.. If so, he should also be charged with fraud

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Ben Kennedy 2 年以前 3

You mean more ruly?

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

AWAAlum 2 年以前 1

More ruly - less unruly ... same same

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

登录

本网站使用cookie。您使用并继续浏览本网站，即表示您接受这一点。

退出

您知道FlightAware航班跟踪是由广告支持吗？

通过允许展示来自FlightAware.com的广告，您可以帮助我们使FlightAware保持免费。我们努力使我们的广告保持相关性，同时不显突兀，以创造一流的体验。在FlightAware上将广告加入白名单快捷而简单，或者请您考虑选择我们的高级帐户.

退出