Mumbai: On Friday, a Jet Airways flight was not even on the runway when it tried to take off from the Riyadh airport in Saudi Arabia. Its two pilots are close to losing their flying licence after they allegedly attempted take-off from a taxiway instead of the runway, endangering nearly 150 on board. Aviation sources have told NDTV that the taxiway, which runs parallel to the designated runway, had not been properly mapped into the plans of Riyadh's King Khalid International Airport. The… (www.ndtv.com) 更多...
The news guy said it was a NEW taxiway under construction, so maybe NOT lighted yet and maybe not on the 10-9 chart either, it was at night so without lights on the taxiway under construction I can see an issue, either way both pilots missed it and could have been a tragedy, glad no one was hurt.
No lights, wrong runway and they still tried to takeoff. FO says "no lights" but it was too late. The runway was too short and all were killed except the FO.
These kinds of errors are more frequent than you might think but you don't hear about them because there was no accident.
"An official of aviation regulator DGCA (Directorate General of Civil Aviation) had said that the pilots aborted take-off after they were informed about a "barrier" on the runway. The plane veered off the runway due to "sudden stopping", the official had earlier said, before the Saudi aviation authorities put out their version."
Nice This is how foreign airlines operate. It is stuff like this, that make flying outside of the U.S. dangerous. Iraqi Air pilots fighting in the cockpit. China Air almost landing in the grass at Chicago O'hare. And these guys attempting a takeoff from a taxiway. You can't make this stuff up.
Here is my half cent Don't be too proud of US way of flying ..... Humans all over are same, with minor variations , FAA is all about USA and so so is NTSB .... their territorial jurisdiction is co-terminus with US territory ! Yes, the aviation authorities all over the world look up to these two agencies for two reasons, as I perceive them , Due to vast resources these agencies are capable to set standards of safe flying, primarily for USA and other countries my emulate or adapt these standards ... And These agencies are made to work in "over drive" mode , thanX to American way of flying , variety wise and volume wise ... and accordingly a large data bank is created to formulate safe flying .. for USA. In comparison, Agencies of other countries neither have the resources nor the data bank to set standards of safe flying and / or investigation ...
this ought to cost them cockpit duties for ever , and should serve warning to all pilots with something on their minds other than the task at hand. These guys win the Aztec Lucky Virgin COntest for this week....
Much ado about nothing. I used to take off and land using a taxiway all the time at a certain Texas airport, it was 2 miles long like the runway and well paved. It was also half a mile closer to the FBO we used.
You can do that kinda stuff in a 172-- but if you are operating a turbine powered aircraft You can't do stuff like this A taxiway doesn't have all the necessary protection and construction as a runway. I used to fly the Bush in Alaska, And you should have seen the crazy places I landed, and took off from. A PROFESSIONAL pilot (crew) Would not even entertain the idea of doing something this stupid.