Back to Squawk list
  • 93

FlightAware is Hiring

提交时间:
 
Love aviation? Join FlightAware! FlightAware serves all segments of the aviation marketplace through best-in-class applications and data services that provide comprehensive information about the current and predicted movement of aircraft. Through the collection, interpretation, and enrichment of hundreds of sources of data, including data from FlightAware's own proprietary terrestrial ADS-B network with tens of thousands of receivers spanning seven continents in 200 countries and… (flightaware.com) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


ADXbear
ADXbear 4
I'm interested.. im instrument rated and licensed Aircraft Dispatcher..fully vaxed, I dont see any positions that want these ratings. I would be a remote worker if interested.

Cleffer
Cleffer 0
"All newly hired employees in the United States are required to be fully vaccinated and present proof of vaccination before their start date." LOL.
avionik99
avionik99 0
Whats the point? It has been proven that the vaccine will not stop you from getting or spreading covid! At best it might lesson symptoms. I know as I have been fully vaxxed and boosted and still got covid! This makes no sense whatsoever!
ReilyStafford
The point is that is the requirement. If you don't want to, you don't have to apply. Seesh. I swear people have lost their minds.
srobak
srobak -2
the point is it should not be a requirement. S[h]eesh. I swear you have lost your mind.
ReilyStafford
the point is nobody cares what you think about a private company's requirement. If you don't want to get vaxxed then don't apply for the job. If you disagree with them, too bad you have no say in the matter.
srobak
srobak -2
Actually lots of people do case - as clearly evidenced by this very comment thread. Personally - I think the un-jabbed (it is not a vax) should be a protected class after all the bias, hostility and discrimination that has been shown them, and the undue hardships they have had to endure for no legitimate, factual reason.

What if the requirement of the private company for these jobs were for the applicants to be white, catholic and conservative? Would you still have no problem with that? Or do we know the truth already that you would be fighting others off for your chance to climb upon the soap-box and scream bloody murder? Ahhh... so you have a say in that matter because it matters to you - but others don't or can't have a say in the matter which matters to them.

Yay hypocrisy.
flybd5juan
Juan Jimenez 3
So don't apply, no one will miss you.
cmuncy
Chris Muncy 3
I know... and I do not understand the reasoning behind the thinking. Yes, being vaxed and boosted *might* lesson the severity of the symptoms but will not prevent it. As a side note: I hope this does not turn in to a shit-show by posting this.
avionik99
avionik99 20
And the funny thing is most of the jobs are "Remote" meaning work from home. Need vaxxed to work from home? Thats even more ridiculous!!
ssobol
Stefan Sobol 12
Don't want to get vaxxed? Then don't apply to work at FlightAware. Seems pretty simple.
srobak
srobak -3
And you missed the point. Vroooom!
flybd5juan
Juan Jimenez -4
What point was that, Tonto?
srobak
srobak 0
that there is no need to be vaxxed for remote work for FA, Dingo.
srobak
srobak 1
I've worked remote since long before covid made it chic to do so. My company tried to institute this after a full year and a half of not requiring it. I simply ignored them and when they tried to followup I threatened legal action. It's been all good ever since then.
hunnybunny
Steve Hunter 1
It is always a good move to threaten your employer with legal action.
srobak
srobak 1
When they are in the wrong - yes, yes it is. There is a long track record of people successfully taking action against employers who cross legal, ethical and contractual lines. If you instead prefer to think of yourself as a slave to your company - then that is how they will treat you, and that is all you will ever be.
Cleffer
Cleffer 0
The United States Supreme Court agrees with him.
ReilyStafford
Actually, that is not true. As of January 28th, the CDC reported that the 2+1 (two shots + booster) is ~95% effective at +14 days. The data is pretty easy to get, the CDC publishes the data on their web site so you can check it out yourself.
MichaelDealey
Michael Dealey -3
The CDC is highly corrupt. Other studies (with no financial ties to pharmaceutical companies) say otherwise.

Also, it is completely illegal to mandate that people take an experimental vaccine. In case you are unaware, there are no FDA approved vaccines available in the United States and there are no planes to make them available anytime soon.

If you think that's bunk, do some research.
srobak
srobak -3
ah... so because of the high efficacy is why the infection rate of the past two months is a full FIVE TIMES that of the previous peak a year ago, and the death rate is at it's highest since the vax [sic] became available. Right. Got it.
btweston
btweston -1
Jesus are we still beating that drum? You’re wrong, and you sound ridiculous.
srobak
srobak -8
You might want to read up on the recent discoveries made at large by the medical community regarding this. It is not _still_ beating the drum - it is in fact a new and confirmed drum. The only ones who sound ridiculous are those who are continuing to ignore it.... that'd be you.
jglazko
jglazko 2
"at large by the medical community". Ok, so supply the source and an actual study, not "my grammaw got covid anywaay"
flybd5juan
Juan Jimenez 1
Do anti-vaxxers ever wonder what life would be like if they'd had enough oxygen at birth?
Cleffer
Cleffer 0
No. We're experiencing life by not taking medicine being forced down our throats which is causing a myriad of issues, such as an increase of 472% of female infertility, a 437% increase of ovarian disfunction, a 369% increase of testicular cancer and a 487% increase of testicular cancer. (Source: The Defense Medical Epidemiology Database) So you can go right ahead and have fun with that because this is working out just how I suspected.
kcrazorbackfan
When are all of you unvaxxed dimwits going to realize that the ever increasing variants of the virus are starting with you?
snickerman
Dale Mingo 1
Any comment on the actual fact that they are hiring and what those positions offer? Anybody?
srobak
srobak 1
not applicable as it is all overshadowed by their very unfortunate jab requirement.
RainbowRiver
Phil Nolden 1
GOOD GRIEF! Can we talk about ANYTHING else besides COVID?
srobak
srobak 1
it is a hiring requirement for FA - so.... it is on-topic.
DaveRK
DaveRK 1
I never in all my years, expected to see such nonsense and uneducated thinking from a (supposedly) intelligent group of people.
srobak
srobak 1
Yeah... I thought FA as a company was better than that, too.
JuddLee
Judd Lee -3
Aww, you lost me at vaxxed. Not a guinea pig
arnaudsimon
arno simon 2
I thought TX forbid VaxPass?
ElliotCannon
Elliot Cannon 2
They probably wouldn't want someone as ignorant as you anyway. LOL
flybd5juan
Juan Jimenez -3
Nah, just an anti-vaxx dimwit.
srobak
srobak -1
anti-covid jab ≠ anti-vax. know the difference
jollyroger23
Robert Preston -9
Maybe thats why theres a shortage of engineers...common sense is to NOT get vaxxed with an experimental shot with horrendous side effects...good luck finding decent people..
ReilyStafford
Probably most engineers know how science works and understand risks. 100% of the engineers (electrical, in my case) are vaxed because the employer requires it. 0% have left because of that requirement.
dprcrna
Engineers may know the science as applied to their area of expertise, but they do not understand medical science works (in particular with reference to the Covid-19 fiasco. We have not gone more than 2 weeks in the last two years where there hasn't been a change in at least 1 or more factors (social distancing, getting the virus if you are vaccinated or not, etc.), obvious lies such as the recent "long term studies reveal..." Unless "long term" has been re-defined, this cannot have had such examination. On top of all the confusion, the removal of personal choice on such a decision is totalitarian. Bottom line: If you take away our choice of being vaccinated, you take away your privilege to hire me. Go hire someone who can't think critically instead.
ReilyStafford
So don't apply. I don't see what the problem is here. United posted the requirement. You choose not to meet it. End of discussion. your anti-vax doublespeak doesn't change that equation. Also, just FYI, the supreme court upheld the right of private companies and local governments to require the vax just as recently as 2022. So really you do not have the right to be un-vaxed. Sorry.
MichaelDealey
Where do you get your information? The Supreme court ruled just the opposite - except for healthcare workers. https://federalnewsnetwork.com/contracting/2022/01/supreme-court-halts-covid-19-vaccine-rule-for-us-businesses/

There are no FDA approved vaccines available in the Untied States and it is therefore unlawful to "mandate" (also not legally enforceable) that people be forced to submit to medical experimentation against their will.
https://stopwrongfulconvictions.wordpress.com/2021/11/04/there-are-no-approved-vaccines-in-the-united-states/

Even if there were approved vaccines available, an individual's consent is paramount. Violating that consent is a breach of the Nuremberg Code - specifically item 1:
https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/medical-magazines/nuremberg-code-establishes-principle-informed-consent
flybd5juan
Juan Jimenez -3
So don't apply. You clearly have zero clue what you are talking about.
srobak
srobak -3
not a chance the last sentence is true
ReilyStafford
It is 100% factual. 0 of the engineers have left. 100% are vaccinated. Sorry you don't like these facts, but they are facts.
flybd5juan
Juan Jimenez 1
The Army has vaccinated 98% of the troops. The rest are getting sh*tcanned. Facts are facts.
srobak
srobak -2
Engineering headcount must be 3, then.
ReilyStafford
NO, around 900-some EEs.
srobak
srobak -7
ok now I know you are talking bullshit. lol
ReilyStafford
nope. sorry. facts are what they are, even if you don't like them.
srobak
srobak -4
keep convincing yourself of that.
ReilyStafford
reality has a way of intruding even if you don't like it. Sorry.
flybd5juan
Juan Jimenez 0
Keep clicking your heels and hoping you will somehow be right. LMAO!

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

ReilyStafford
Then just don't apply. Simple as that. Any employee that doesn't care enough to get vaxxed probably shouldn't apply for a job where it's required....

[This poster has been suspended.]

ReilyStafford
I suggest you look into the recent Supreme Court rulings on the exact topic - from as recent as 2022 they upheld a private company has the right to require the vax. Also, just in case you're curious, the Supreme Court ruled that local and state governments can actually *require* you to get vaxxed. Sorry but you're the one spouting the BS here.
srobak
srobak -1
now now, don't go confusing the issue with facts
flybd5juan
Juan Jimenez -3
Who cares what you think about it? Don't apply and leave it at that. No one will miss you.
cmconlisk
After reading "to be required to be fully vaccinated and present proof of vaccination" I no longer want to have anything to do with 'FlightAware'. I will be shutting down my station and using the hardware for other purpose. Do some research ...
srobak
srobak -1
oooh be careful.... the radical whackadoos don't like it when you turn their own cancel culture against them. you get accused of being intolerant.... or something.
Viperguy46
Jesse Carroll -1
Wonder what DR. Fauci would say about this aviation site?
Dr. Anthony Fauci ? MD/NIAD/ Director/BSS in charge

[This comment was deleted.]

[This comment was deleted.]

[This comment was deleted.]

[This comment was deleted.]

garyrozar
Gary Rozar -3
All vaxxed people have 36mts to live or less...I would say 18 Mts at the most... but until they die they are poisoning the rest of the worlds population...so to the vaxxed find the nearest live 5 G tower and hug it for a while...that is the right thing for you to do at this point...or you will turn into a zombie like creature walking the streets after all hospitals refuse to treat you b/c most of those Doctors and RN'S are showing the same open running sores b/c All the Vaxxed are in the same boat! 2Water events happening in April? ...Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific will be nuked?...move 100-200 miles away from any coastline...
kc4wvl
William Smith -3
Not well known or reported is that on January 15, 2022, the International Common Law Court of Justice, in Brussels, Belgium, found the top officials of Pfizer and KlaxoSmithKline, China and the Vatican, guilty on charges of "Genocide" and "Crimes against Humanity" (Case Docket No. 09152021-A001).

The Court has sentenced 75 individuals to life imprisonment and stripped defendants of "all assets, disestablishes their corporations and lawfully prohibits the further manufacture, sale or use of their COVID vaccines as “products of genocide and mass murder”."

The convicted include Albert Bourla and Emma Walmsley, the CEO’s of Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Xi Jinping, President of China, ‘Pope’ Francis (Jorge Bergoglio), ‘Queen’ Elizabeth (Windsor) and Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada.

Judgment and Warrants (Arrest and Seizure) can be downloaded from www.republicofkanata.ca under “Breaking News”.
montyny
Is this a top secret case or something? The official site for the International Court of Justice in Belgium doesn't seem to have any cases related to covid https://www.icj-cij.org/en/list-of-all-cases/introduction/desc
Oh ... you're talking about some made up group by a handful of people (https://goldenageofgaia.com/2022/01/18/iclcj-who-what-where/) that no established authority recognises. Good luck (possibly) to anyone stupid enough to try and enforce these 'warrants' or 'judgements' - I'm sure all those named are quaking in their boots.
DaveRK
DaveRK 0
This post is a copy of a false & fake news report.
kc4wvl
William Smith -2
Have you even read or even seen the court opinion and the warrants? I have. Also found here: http://murderbydecree.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Verdict-and-Sentence-of-the-International-Common-Law-Court-of-Justice.pdf

Try reading before you assume that it's "This post is a copy of a false & fake news report."
DaveRK
DaveRK 0
Ahh yes I read several articles from established news outlets.
kc4wvl
William Smith 1
As I indicated, "Not well known or reported..."

The established news outlets will not report anything that does not line up with their agenda nor their narrative.
srobak
srobak 0
established news outlets...

you mean the ones who touted Soviet collusion w/ Trump & the Steele dossier, insisted Jacob Blake was unarmed even after he came on their own channel and interviewed admitting he had a knife in his hand and refused to comply, that people wielding tiki torches (including 1 black man) outside Youngkin's campaign bus were the cross-section of his racist supporters and were not planted there by a radical left organization, that reported ivermectin as being horse medicine while covering up the fact it has been used in meds for head lice and skin conditions in humans for decades, or that hospitals were turning away gunshot victims because they were overrun with ivermectin ODs, or who intentionally mis-edited the Sandmann interaction and outright slandered him resulting in hundreds of millions in lawsuits against every single one of the established news outlets, or accusing a grocery chain of benefitting from "pay for play" in vax distro, or of border agents using whips against illegal alien border jumpers, or that Rittenhouse crossed state lines with an illegal weapon and was a racist (despite having only shot white people), or that insists that CRT is not taught in schools, or that there is no inflation (or that it is "transitory"), or how this country which has for generations had the most diverse population of any other country on the globe is systemically racist? Shall I go on?

Yeah - ok.... you keep on reading those, and enjoy the shining example of credibility that comes with them.

登录

还没有帐户吗? 现在就注册(免费),设置诸多自定义功能、航班提醒等等!
您知道FlightAware航班跟踪是由广告支持吗?
通过允许展示来自FlightAware.com的广告,您可以帮助我们使FlightAware保持免费。我们努力使我们的广告保持相关性,同时不显突兀,以创造一流的体验。在FlightAware上将广告加入白名单快捷而简单,或者请您考虑选择我们的高级帐户.
退出