Back to Squawk list
  • 24

Boeing CEO’s penchant for cost-cutting doesn’t apply to his trips on the company jet

提交时间:
 
When it comes to building planes, Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun is all about streamlining costs. An accountant by training, Calhoun has prioritized fiscal discipline over his four years at the helm, tightening the belt to free up cash flow and put the company on better financial footing. ... Boeing reported in a regulatory filing that ... Calhoun got an extra half-million dollars worth of personal private jet travel on the company’s dime that had previously been improperly recorded as business travel. (www.cnn.com) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


sjpalmer
Steven Palmer 46
Staying on topic - its easy to describe Mr Calhoun like so many other CEOs in the world - full of self importance, promoted beyond their actual abilities and skills, and most of them utterly useless.
In this case, merely a BEAN-COUNTER and look what an absolute disaster he has made at BOEING, but hey ho - he will ride off into the sunset with a huge multi-million send-off, and his ego still intact.
Instead, he should be FIRED and taken to court for gross INCOMPETANCE and BOEING should recoup many tens of his millions of $ (shareholders monies) that he did NOT earn or merit over the past years!!
CapeCodder
CapeCodder 3
I agree with you, however, paying millions of dollars for incompetence while the business loses prestige and revenue is not limited to corporate executives. Countless professional and college coaches/managers are fired from their positions due to losing records yet they are paid the full amount of the remainder of their multi-year, multi-million dollar contracts and then typically are hired by another franchised for even more money. This has been happening in professional sports for decades. The payouts and perks are just bigger in corporate America.

[This comment has been downvoted. Show anyway.]

patpylot
patrick baker 15
david calhoon: as a young boy he never learned to share. As an adult he could never compromise. Me, me, me. never you. ever. unsucessful human being
mattwestuk
Matt West 52
Of course he’s using their private jet for everything. He’d be crazy to risk his life flying on commercial Boeing aircraft.
Gpoon49
Gene Poon 8
It has been many years, but on an American Airlines flight from DFW to SFO on a DC-10 (THAT long ago), seated next to me in First Class was....BOB CRANDALL, the airline's CEO! We carried on a conversation for most of the flight. The man was brilliant; it took everything I had to keep up with him.

On another trip, where I was traveling by Amtrak train between the Northeast and Florida, I was seated at a dining car table with W. Graham Claytor, then Amtrak president. He explained how he always preferred to travel overnight by himself, in a single-bed sleeping car room, and to share a dining car table as other passengers did. Later we hung out at an open Dutch door window, watching the scenery. He was as brilliant as Crandall.

These days, CEOs travel on private jets, and in the case of Amtrak, if not flying, then in a private car which is only one of several cars reserved for him and his entourage, with an exclusive handpicked crew to serve them. In the case of Amtrak, this is in addition to a large bonus, from a company which loses money, were it not for the dollars of tax money shoveled into it by the largesse of the politicos.
MichaelDealey
Michael Dealey 11
In other words, there was a time when the CEO took pride in the company he ran, subjected himself to the same experience as his own customers, and considered bad performance to be a direct reflection of his own integrity and ability to lead.

I don't fully blame the CEOs but they're not off the hook either. CEOs answer to someone. Start looking into the Board of Directors. Look into their own businesses, the other boards they may sit on, their outside affiliations and the kinds of causes they support, and I'm betting you'll find a pattern.

Unless you've been sleeping or are in denial, it's very clear that many of biggest companies in corporate America have been infected with certain ideologies and it's not that difficult to find unscrupulous people who will prioritize social agendas over company excellence and customer service -- or even public safety -- for the right price.
rgraham11
Robert Graham 7
A $45 million dollar retirement package along with everything else. No wonder Boeing can't afford quality controls.
sparkie624
sparkie624 10
Everyone knows that CEO's are way above everyone else... Just the way they are.. They feel Privileged!
augerin
Dave Mathes 3
...I would speculate there are not many CEOs on this forum...
NeilPostlethwaiteItsAllBroken
Corporate America - nickel and diming the world - staff and customers - since they took that task over from the British.

Curious who he needs security from ?
Lneward
Lance Neward 2
A friend, who worked as a mid-level executive for a division of a major oil company, got a call from a friend of his who worked, at about the same level, for a competitor. The friend said, "Hey, Jim, you want to know your next year's marketing plan? I can tell you what's in it." It turns out that the competitor had been flying commercially and was seated across the aisle and one row back from one of Jim's people, who was working on said marketing plan on his laptop and the marketing plan was clearly visible to the competitor.

There are several reasons that high-level executives fly in corporate aircraft: one is secure conversations and computer work, it is very difficult to have a secure conversation or work securely on one's laptop when flying commercially, even in first class. Another is time savings--being able to go when they need to and to fly pretty much directly to where they need to be, places at the heavy iron either cannot, or does not, go.

I agree that the corporate jet usage can be, and is sometimes, abused, but the control of the corporate policy on that issue generally rests with board. Some boards have made some pretty lousy decisions, but a corporate jet, properly and carefully used, is a very useful and effective business tool.

While I am an ATP-rated pilot I am not, and never have been, a corporate pilot.
cjhillconsultingservices
CJ Hill 4
Only two points in the article are meaningful. 1. Boeing requires Calhoun to fly private for both business and personal trips. 2. There is no evidence that the charging of personal trips as business was anything more than a need to reclassify them as business trips. Anything beyond that in the article is speculation, jealousy, envy, sour grapes and piling on.
genojoy
Gene Joy 4
Sadly, it's not just Boeing. Senior management in MANY fields is inept and out of touch. Quality of product commonly takes a backseat to the dollar. Auto parts, appliances, furniture....you name it. Finding quality at a reasonable price is almost impossible. Finding dividends and executive pay off the charts....not so tough. We, as a society, are being taken for a ride, but hopefully, not on a Boeing.
dlwmiami
D. W. 2
An "oopsie," says the article (attached). Right! As though it were a scrivener's error, rather than a brazen undertaking on Boeing's part to (a) get its own, additional expense deduction(s) (you can be sure Boeing really needs it) and (b) cover for its impoverished soon-to-be ex-CEO, who, apparently, is in dire financial straits.

Great corporate citizen, that Boeing! With the best interests of the country (and its government) at heart, the one that feeds Boeing so copiously that even bean counters need bean counters to sum it all up. Like the guy said decades ago during the McCarthy/HUAC hearings: "Have you no decency? Have you no shame?"
scottiek
scottiek 2
Would be interesting to know how many private jets has and what make/model. Or do they lease as needed?
96flstc
96flstc 4
five or six Bombardier CL600-2B16 Challengers and a BBJ
Anton1
Anton1 1
actually more like 3 BBJs (737 Business Jets) and 3 CL650/CL605 unless things changed very recently.
linbb
linbb -3
Well BFI has several tenants which are very well known that own several business jets they lease out.And since you are so worried about them Eagle airport in CO would be a good place to start. Every type of biz jet and up to not including a 747 and A380 come in and out of there during a normal year. During most hollidays the landing line up is just like a major airport. Parking is a problem usually overflow into another airport during that time is needed. So what that exec does is nothing compared to this deal. If you think am BS about it go watch it my friend who flys out of there can tell you about a half hour wait to take off or land. I get quite a kick out of some posts on here who dont understand Aspin and Vail people who live or come and go from there.
augerin
Dave Mathes 2
...I could have sworn this article was about CEO jet hopping...not climate change...
MoominMama
Janice Watkins 1
Hypocrite
u147688
Mike Mair 1
And some folks wonder why we have unions..a way to say hey dilbert we a not taking a pay cut to fund your private jet..
MikeMohle
Mike Mohle -9
No mention of excessive use of fossil fuels, triggering "climate change"? C'Mon CNN, I expect more in these types of reports.
avionik99
avionik99 -5
I guess downvoting is now the method used to agree with truthful statements. Every ill in the world is being blamed on climate change but not when good things are happening. Not one article on how wonderful climate change is for the California drought, being completely overturned in the last couple of years. But when they had a lack of rain/snow climate change was always mentioned as the cause for that bad weather. Good weather??? No credit is ever given to climate change for that, why is that? Is it because we all know its mere political junk science.
augerin
Dave Mathes 7
...what does this babble have to do with CEO jet hopping...
jetjocknj
jetjocknj 5
@avionik99 - The world's climate scientists are in general agreement that climate change is bearing down on us at fightening speed, and with possible horrendous results for most if not all animal and plant life. We've got to stop making free carbon and get rid of what we have. Scientists, as you know, are people that know more than you or me. So, to dismiss the world's scientists' findings and predictions as "junk" amounts to a display of pure ignorance.
sjpalmer
Steven Palmer 1
Scientists also work for outfits that need $$$ (they are businesses) and if a Govt or Quango (Quasi Govt Dept) comes along and gives them a contract to stu'dy something .................... what do you think the outcome is .....? (maybe one that 'the client wants ...........
Try to find an independent scientist for REAL analysis, oh and while you are at it, just check out who are investors in all these new renewable energy companies .................................... Oh! Shock/Horror! its the same people who have shares in all the military (war-mongering) companies!
linbb
linbb -1
Not all are in agreement with that statement. Also climate has been changing in all recorded time. Truth is the best deal not the sledge hammer approach taken when talking about it. The amount of change some think is needed will never take place without dire consequences to peoples every day lives. If one stops to think about it doing so would cause people in the USA for one such drastic changes in there life it would not work out.
jetjocknj
jetjocknj 8
All our modern-day conveniences came to us not by wishful thinking or luck but through science—and by scientists. You and others probably would have been arguing against TV, I-phones, and the internet because of all the bad "sledgehammer" things that might possibly come from these new scientific discoveries. Scientists know what they are talking about and what they are doing (and non-scientists trying to refute scientists’ conclusions and recommendations with uninformed bleatings comes across as a pure laugh line). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has ALL the world's reputable climate scientists as coauthors or supporters. Kindly look up their Synthesis Report of 2023, and as a living, breathing, functional human being, you will be convinced.
sjpalmer
Steven Palmer -1
Only one question for you my friend ......... Do you believe what Governments (for that read corrupt, paid-off, under instructions from Global elite squilionaires) tell you ................. Oh dear!!
jetjocknj
jetjocknj 0
Irrelevant question. The IPCC is the United Nations of climate science and not a governmental body. Please go to https://www.ipcc.ch/ and read. The writing reaches down to high school level, so you'll have no trouble understanding the reporting.
sjpalmer
Steven Palmer 0
Thank you for insulting my education level but I shall not retaliate, as some of us are on a higher plane, and do NOT believe what so called 'authorities' (or CNN) tell us, and you have probably without realising gave away the clue --- the United Nations of Climate Science - ahhh yes The United Nations - a wonderfully independent and unbiased body who are as much use as a 'Chocolate Fireguard'
MikeMohle
Mike Mohle 0
Just like all the Covid nonsense. Comply with our directives or else!
1ValerieScott
Valerie Scott -1
of course not - we believe the corporate propaganda machine from the likes of Exon Mobil , Koch industries and of course Boeing. Follow the money buddy.
jrgp1
Jose R Gonzalez -2
Like most CEOs cost cutting does not apply to them. Remember arsehole supreme Robert Crandall, previous CEO of defunct American Airlines, all he could say was "you need to cut costs".
Lneward
Lance Neward 2
By my last reckoning, AA is still alive and doing at least OK. I worked at TWA when Crandall was there; he was a pretty sharp cookie (at least until he went next door to AA)
jrgp1
US Airways is alive. AA is dead. The only surviving feature of American Airlines was the name. Not even the logo; something that is unbelievable. The surviving management and the shit service and airplanes are US Airways. AA is dead.

登录

还没有帐户吗? 现在就注册(免费),设置诸多自定义功能、航班提醒等等!
您知道FlightAware航班跟踪是由广告支持吗?
通过允许展示来自FlightAware.com的广告,您可以帮助我们使FlightAware保持免费。我们努力使我们的广告保持相关性,同时不显突兀,以创造一流的体验。在FlightAware上将广告加入白名单快捷而简单,或者请您考虑选择我们的高级帐户.
退出