44 投票數 (4.93 平均) 和 10,205 浏览  

McDonnell Douglas DC-8-70 (N817NA) - Full Quality Photo --> https://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/McDonnell-Douglas-DC-8-72/5634693
/images/icons/csMagGlass.png 中等 / 大图 / 全尺寸

McDonnell Douglas DC-8-70 (N817NA)

提交时间:

Full Quality Photo --> https://www.airliners.net/photo/NASA/McDonnell-Douglas-DC-8-72/5634693

Comments

Please log in or register to post a comment.

Gary Schenauer
A fantastic capture!! A NASA bird AND a DC-8. As always, the pic is *****+ and then add in the fact it is a DC-8 (another 5) and a NASA bird (5 more). Ultra exceptional, Colin.
Paul Wisgerhof
A total of 556 DC-8s in all variants were built between 1959 and 1973. The 70 series were all conversions of 60 series from the J3TD engines to CFM-56 turbofans. 110 60s were converted to 70s. Less than 30 are known to be flying world wide, most as freighters or private birds.
jahamley
Flew on many of these back in the day. There was a perception, especially if you sat in the back of a "Stretch 8", that the plane drooped on either side of the wing spar.
James Wysong
I loved flying on Delta's DC-8s back in the day. Most people don't know that the DC-8 was the first passenger jet to go supersonic. On August 21, 1961, Douglas test pilot William Magruder (with none other than Chuck Yeager flying chase) took N9604Z to Mach 1.01 in a dive from 52,000 feet (also a record) at Edwards Air Force Base.
Rick Simmons
The airplane is operated by NASA out of Armstrong Flight Research Center/Edwards Air Force Base. When I was at NASA Ames between 1988 and 1998, it was operated out of Moffett Airfield, Mountain View, CA with the tail number of N717NA.
Dwight Hartje
Fantastic shot of this unique aircraft!
ROBERT MILLS JR
Agree on the FIVE STAR of any DC-8, and, such a superb photograph!
However, I don't understand why this re-engined DC-8-30 is categorized as a "Series 70", because, it was a DC-8-30 (short versus stretch version) before the engine upgrade.

I don't understand why it not possibly a DC-8-50, the stretch versions being DC-60/70s.
Even if the engines are greatly de-rated, this DC-8 must have one heck of a climb rate.

National airlines "Beverly" was my first flight on a commercial jet when I was 14, having paid for the flight with my lawn mowing money.
Little brother got to go for free thanks to the parents.
Michael Wulfsohn
That looks like a -30 or -50 series. Its not stretched long enough to be a "Super 60/70”.
Paul coyne
Brilliant aircraft, very heavy to fly compared to the Boeing 747 but I loved flying it for many years worldwide including a flight from Singapore to Melbourne when we had a partial Hydraulic failure we manually flew it for the rest of the flight, had it fixed in Australia and we lost the same hydraulic pump (engine driven) on our way back to Singapore where we parked it and got off. The company asked us to take it to Bangkok.....nope we have done our bit.....sort it out.
CHRIS ROBEY
Very nice story Paul. I've always liked the DC8. Was there only the single hydraulic system for flight controls? Engine driven pumps on all engines or maybe not?? The F28 would be the closest I have come to this kind of scenario...
动态日志
需要 N817NA 1998年以来的完整历史搜索吗? 现在购买,一小时内即可收到。
日期 机型 始发地 目的地 出发 到达 飞行时间
No Recent History Data
注册用户(注册免费而且快捷!)可以查看3 months的历史记录。 加入
 

登录

还没有帐户吗? 现在就注册(免费),设置诸多自定义功能、航班提醒等等!
您知道FlightAware航班跟踪是由广告支持吗?
通过允许展示来自FlightAware.com的广告,您可以帮助我们使FlightAware保持免费。我们努力使我们的广告保持相关性,同时不显突兀,以创造一流的体验。在FlightAware上将广告加入白名单快捷而简单,或者请您考虑选择我们的高级帐户.
退出