Back to Squawk list
  • 19

White House: 'Why we need aviation user fees'

提交时间:
 
After almost 9,000 people urged the president to take damaging aviation user fees off the table, the administration on Jan. 13 offered its response: No way. (www.aopa.org) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


TXCAVU
How about ATC gets a system that actually works and then we'll talk fees.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
I am of the opinion the gov does not need another fee or tax for any purpose what so ever! Work with what you got, period.
jonprovencher
Jon Provencher 0
Woah! An idea that makes little sense, is vague, and is open to interpretation! When did the government start making those!?! *sarcasm intended*
andrewderr
andrewderr 0
It just makes me ill to read such a poorly written WH response. That lame response really does show us the intelligence factor (or lack thereof) at work in these fees. It took me 90 seconds of research to see the difference in the fuel taxes confirmed in the AOPA article. You would think the WH has these resources too. What a halfassed halfcocked halfthought response to 8904 citizens' petition.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
Lame has become the new standard.
kylevk
The response says that this fee would reduce the budget deficit by $10 billion over 10 years. The debt increases by FOUR BILLION DOLLARS every DAY.
WALLACE24
WALLACE24 0
The plane is crashing but they have yet to declare an emergency.
chris13
Chris Bryant 0
This fits right in with their class-warfare rhetoric. Obviously, every person that flies an airplane MUST be one of those "evil" rich guys. If someone in the WH actually had a clue, they'd understand why user-fees will be crippling to the GA community.
CTaylor959
Chuck Taylor 0
Added cost for student pilots is not a good thing for pilot population

登录

还没有帐户吗? 现在就注册(免费),设置诸多自定义功能、航班提醒等等!
您知道FlightAware航班跟踪是由广告支持吗?
通过允许展示来自FlightAware.com的广告,您可以帮助我们使FlightAware保持免费。我们努力使我们的广告保持相关性,同时不显突兀,以创造一流的体验。在FlightAware上将广告加入白名单快捷而简单,或者请您考虑选择我们的高级帐户.
退出