Back to Squawk list
  • 24

Sino-Russian long-haul CR929 advances slowly

提交时间:
 
The CRAIC consortium, formed by aircraft manufacturers Chinese COMAC and Russian UAC, now has a structure and has confirmed its initial schedule. The preliminary design of the future long-haul CR929 and the choice of subcontractors will be announced in 2018. Its entry into service is planned in 2025 for the moment. (airlinerwatch.com) 更多...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


djames225
djames225 4
Im wondering if the Aviadvigatel PD28 and PD35 will be ready to bolt on these along with the Pratt's
djames225
djames225 1
Another engine to throw in the mix is the Kuznetsov PD30...seems it is suppose to either replace the AN-124 and AN-225 engines and or be the engine for a new cargo craft that will replace the 124
Moviela
Ric Wernicke -2
That sounds like a crash worthy combination.
djames225
djames225 5
And why is that Ric?..Airbus and Boeing both use UAC and Chinese firms to build parts for their craft and I think the Russian engineers will have most influence.
maverick49
Tom Novak 2
True, apart from the fuselage, UAC will take care of all.
Moviela
Ric Wernicke 1
Neither country has any history of making quality large aircraft, nor even supplying the highest technically sophisticated assemblies needed to make a competitive jet engine.

Sure with enough supervision and hand-holding they can make some commodity parts used on aircraft, but don't turn your back for a second.

The parts Boeing and EADS makes in those countries are more for greasing the skids for the sales department rather than economy and efficiency for manufacturing.
paulgilpin1953
paul gilpin 1
speaking of technical assemblies, makes one wonder why the US buys the RD-80 from russia rather than building one theirselves. not only that, but NASA input directly linked to sanctions on russia specifically references imports of RD-80 are not affected by the sanctions.
djames225
djames225 1
Id say Russia is ok making large aircraft..seems they know enough that US use the 124's and 225 quite a bit..and that Aviadvigatel PD-14 is no slouch..true their older jet engines were real keroscene burners, but the dang things didnt break.
Oh and those parts Boeing and EADS get made by UAC..dont kid yourself as they are not just for greasing skids.
djames225
djames225 3
And by large aircraft, you can rule out the TU-154 and TU-144..those 2 were accidents just waiting to happen
bartmiller
bartmiller 0
Both the 124 and 225 fly with some interesting extra cargo: spare engines and mechanics.
djames225
djames225 1
Id love to know where those emgines are..last time I was in the 225, didnt see any engines in the cargo bay nor mechanics..a couple flight engineers and some spare parts..when she popped a cork in Leipzeg Nov. 2016 and #2 started acting like it had afterburners going, mechanics from Motor Sich flew over and repaired it.

登录

还没有帐户吗? 现在就注册(免费),设置诸多自定义功能、航班提醒等等!
本网站使用cookie。您使用并继续浏览本网站,即表示您接受这一点。
退出
您知道FlightAware航班跟踪是由广告支持吗?
通过允许展示来自FlightAware.com的广告,您可以帮助我们使FlightAware保持免费。我们努力使我们的广告保持相关性,同时不显突兀,以创造一流的体验。在FlightAware上将广告加入白名单快捷而简单,或者请您考虑选择我们的高级帐户.
退出