← Back to Squawk list

Boeing's First 787-10 Enters into Final Assembly

提交时间：7 年以前

Boeing said on Thursday it has begun the final assembly of the first 787-10, a production milestone for the third and largest member of the Dreamliners. (airwaysmag.com) 更多...

rleiro

13 条会员评论

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Cade foster 7 年以前 1

Looking forward to seeing this beauty!

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Calvin Chan 7 年以前 1

7810 Seven Eight Ten would be a good indicator

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Dr John Quinn 7 年以前 1

Calvin: that was the point of the question. I'm looking for a three-digit indicator, per the examples you would see on an airline schedule: 737-800 becomes 738; a 747-8i becomes a 748. This isn't that.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Roy Hunte 7 年以前 1

B78X

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Vectorer 7 年以前 1

Whoops...CORRECTION. Make that B781, but we will see.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Scott Campbell 7 年以前 1

Seven Eight One

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Dr John Quinn 7 年以前 1

Well, thank you. And what would criteria be for said naming? Because it would preclude using another "781" for any future potential downsize craft on the same frame being the "781", short for 787-11, (should Boeing go the Airbus route to smaller craft, á la the A318,-9s). Probably stretching the probabilities beyond their reality, but fun to discuss... thanks for your conjecture, Scott.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Dr John Quinn 7 年以前 1

What will be the three-digit indicator for this craft, as seen in timetables (e.g. 777-300= 773; 787-9= 789)? Would it be 781 or 780?

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Roy Hunte 7 年以前 1

Actually B78X

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Roy Hunte 7 年以前 0

Or B78J like they did with the A35K.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Vectorer 7 年以前 0

Should be B789...