全部
← Back to Squawk list
Poll Shows Travelers Still Fear 737 Max As Boeing Tries To Get It Back In The Air
American Airlines now says it's keeping its Boeing 737 Max jets parked until after the summer travel season. The Max has been grounded for three months. Airlines have asked regulators around the globe to hold a unified press conference when they're confident the planes are safe to fly. That may not restore passengers' confidence. (www.npr.org) 更多...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
Wasn't there a similar backlash against the DC-10 for a bit, with the cargo door issue, then the crash at O'hare? How did the airlines and Douglas get past that?
What about the A300 that went in due to control problems not much said about it but social media didn't exist back then.
Already explained to you before, and I guess has to be explained to you YET AGAIN.
AAL587 HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH CONTROL PROBLEMS, meaning problems using the controls of the aircraft. The vertical stabilizer of the A306 separated due to excessive of the rudder inputs, not from "problems" with the controls. The A306 wasn't and still isn't FBW, and you still fail to understand that. That's your ignorance here.
And as far as not having "social media" back then? We most certainly did, and it was discussed ad infinitum back then; just not on what you refer to nowadays as social media. That is your naivety here.
But again, let's not let that get in the way your feeble attempt at "Whataboutism" here.
AAL587 HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH CONTROL PROBLEMS, meaning problems using the controls of the aircraft. The vertical stabilizer of the A306 separated due to excessive of the rudder inputs, not from "problems" with the controls. The A306 wasn't and still isn't FBW, and you still fail to understand that. That's your ignorance here.
And as far as not having "social media" back then? We most certainly did, and it was discussed ad infinitum back then; just not on what you refer to nowadays as social media. That is your naivety here.
But again, let's not let that get in the way your feeble attempt at "Whataboutism" here.
chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR0404.pdf
The accident report from the NTSB that directly linked the rudder control system on the a306 as a contributing factor in the loss of AA587 over the NY burbs!
http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?do=main.textpost&id=20499365-2de2-4a5c-93c6-334b05ccaae5
A reference to the subsequent, albeit, late AD issued by the FAA on said rudder control issue addressed by the NTSB and EASA in the accident report.
None so blind as those that fail to see! You do know how to use a link and read don't you Bud?
The accident report from the NTSB that directly linked the rudder control system on the a306 as a contributing factor in the loss of AA587 over the NY burbs!
http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?do=main.textpost&id=20499365-2de2-4a5c-93c6-334b05ccaae5
A reference to the subsequent, albeit, late AD issued by the FAA on said rudder control issue addressed by the NTSB and EASA in the accident report.
None so blind as those that fail to see! You do know how to use a link and read don't you Bud?
And what does any of this have to do with THE FAILURE OF THE CONTROLS??
Talk about missing the point, especially in the context of the B38M and B39M. AAL587 was the fault of OVERUSE of the Controls, not LOSS or not having any control of the aircraft.
Want links? How about to the direct report:
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR0404.pdf
Where we get:
The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of
this accident was the in-flight separation of the vertical stabilizer as a result of the loads
beyond ultimate design that were created by the first officer’s unnecessary and excessive
rudder pedal inputs. Contributing to these rudder pedal inputs were characteristics of the
Airbus A300-600 rudder system design and elements of the American Airlines Advanced
Aircraft Maneuvering Program.
Again, excessive use of the controls means they had full control of the controls, not loss of all controls like LNI610 and ETH610 had.
So if you're going to come at people with links, be correct about them, otherwise, practice what you preach with regards to those being so blind that fail to see. Pot. Kettle. Black.
Talk about missing the point, especially in the context of the B38M and B39M. AAL587 was the fault of OVERUSE of the Controls, not LOSS or not having any control of the aircraft.
Want links? How about to the direct report:
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR0404.pdf
Where we get:
The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of
this accident was the in-flight separation of the vertical stabilizer as a result of the loads
beyond ultimate design that were created by the first officer’s unnecessary and excessive
rudder pedal inputs. Contributing to these rudder pedal inputs were characteristics of the
Airbus A300-600 rudder system design and elements of the American Airlines Advanced
Aircraft Maneuvering Program.
Again, excessive use of the controls means they had full control of the controls, not loss of all controls like LNI610 and ETH610 had.
So if you're going to come at people with links, be correct about them, otherwise, practice what you preach with regards to those being so blind that fail to see. Pot. Kettle. Black.
1600 ppl? Wow. I'm sure once the big names in the United States bring back the MAX into service, many won't even know what type of aircraft they're on other than that it's a 737.