It looks like it was built out for him by Air Cargo, and possibly managed by them as well, but the registration shows that it's owned by a Utah bank trustee, which I would expect is a proxy for this guy. I do think he actually owns this beast. https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?NNumbertxt=767CJ

(Written on 2019年 05月 17日)(Permalink)

Oops; you're right. Photos are hard to find. The only one I found was from a distance showing the police tape. https://www.deseretnews.com/article/595108561/Accidental-strafing-divides-NJ-area.html

(Written on 2018年 11月 10日)(Permalink)

Have Google, will travel. https://www.foxnews.com/story/f-16-accidentally-fires-on-school https://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/05/nyregion/warplane-strafes-a-school-in-new-jersey.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strafing_of_the_Little_Egg_Harbor_Intermediate_School http://www.f-16.net/f-16-news-article1241.html

(Written on 2018年 11月 10日)(Permalink)

Just wrap it in speed tape. It'll hold.

(Written on 2018年 11月 01日)(Permalink)

Depending on your political leaning you can select among these alternative sources for essentially the same story. You're welcome. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/16-accidentally-blown-belgian-air-force-mechanic/story?id=58562311 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/10/14/belgian-mechanic-accidentally-destroys-f-16-fighter-jet-cannon/ http://www.f-16.net/f-16-news-article5127.html https://www.rt.com/news/441017-f-16-aircraft-explodes-belgium/ https://twitter.com/BeAirForce/status/1050394683007008768 https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=216189 https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2018/10/16/belgian-air-force-mechanic-opens-fire-by-mistake-blows-up-another-f-16/ https://fox61.com/2018/10/15/belgian-f16-destroyed-due-to-accidental-cannon-firing/

(Written on 2018年 10月 20日)(Permalink)

"Cannon ground-tested operational. 11-OCT-2018. Joe Mechanic, #1234567, /s/"

(Written on 2018年 10月 19日)(Permalink)

10th paragraph. "The researchers compared detected sUAS activity with locations and altitudes prescribed by the FAA’s UAS Facility Maps. According to the FAA, “UAS Facility Maps show the maximum altitudes around airports where the FAA may authorize Part 107 operations without additional safety analysis.” More than 20 percent of the 177 flights were flying higher than the safe altitude prescribed for their operating area. Moreover, researchers compared detected UAS operations to historical manned aircraft flight data, revealing several near encounters."

(Written on 2018年 10月 19日)(Permalink)

"Ramp" is what we still use in the US. You can say "apron" in ICAO-ian if you wish, and I'm sure ATC will understand, but we'll still giggle a bit.

(Written on 2018年 06月 29日)(Permalink)

That's a pretty good AP article.

(Written on 2018年 05月 11日)(Permalink)

Looks like they fixed the wording; it no longer says "runway." Though "gated area" still sounds a bit odd, especially in Baltimore. It's not San Diego.

(Written on 2018年 05月 11日)(Permalink)