注册时间: | |
最后在线时间 | |
语言 | English (USA) |
Exactly. It is a testament to the DC-10 design that 1)Fedex is still using them, and 2)the Air Force still uses them as tankers.
(Written on 2020年 12月 06日)(Permalink)
A lot of people will come back around once the elites start offshoring jobs again and our trade deficit skyrockets over the next several years.
(Written on 2020年 11月 22日)(Permalink)
Exactly. Many Americans are ignorant of the fact that the Europeans, our supposed allies, have had tariffs on many of our exports for decades, while we allowed them to export many of their products to us tariff-free. There are also the egregious barriers to entry that Europe uses to protect its domestic industries. Why should the U.S. not be allowed to reciprocate? Tariffs are the only way, short of physical force, to encourage other countries to play fair and play by the rules. The middle-class in the U.S. started to wake up to the fact that we've been getting ripped off on trade by China and other countries for many years, which has hurt our industries and especially blue-collar workers. I guess a lot of people went back to sleep.
(Written on 2020年 11月 22日)(Permalink)
You should be proud, Sue. I wish that Bombardier had maintained ownership and control of that aircraft. Delta will benefit from having such a good aircraft.
(Written on 2020年 10月 26日)(Permalink)
I see, another America hater. That's fine, you're entitled to your opinion. The fact is that the USA has been getting treated very unfairly on trade by several nations, including Europe and Canada, our supposed allies, for decades. Our dumb politicians tolerated the unfair trade policies, but now that is changing. The US has a 600 billion dollar trade deficit with the rest of the world, and 27 billion alone with Canada. It's not really about the deficits themselves, but the unfair tariffs and barriers that other countries use to hurt U.S. exports and protect their own industries. The USA is now just doing on trade what every other country has been doing for decades, but for some reason we're the bad guys. Whatever.
(Written on 2020年 10月 26日)(Permalink)
Uh, OK. Yes, the Airbus A220 is certainly a cool, high quality, efficient airliner from what I've read about it. And, yes, it was actually developed by Bombardier, a Canadian aircraft manufacturer. Kudos to Bombardier. But why should "America" in particular say "thank you"? If a company develops a good product and sells it for an agreed upon price, then that is the free market at work. Other countries whose airline companies purchase the plane will also benefit from it. Why single out the USA?
(Written on 2020年 10月 24日)(Permalink)
I was with you up until the last 2 lines, where you once again try to blame everything bad that happens on the Republicans. Do you really believe that Democrats are any less corrupt than Republicans? Are you really that naive? For the record, I don't really like either Presidential candidate, but you should do a Google search for "Biden brother Iraq housing contract", "Biden son China deal", and "Biden son Ukraine Burisma". I'm not picking on him, but he is the Democrat candidate for President so we must put the spotlight on him right now. In fact, most politicians are selfish, opportunistic leeches who use their positions to benefit themselves and their friends and family.
(Written on 2020年 10月 01日)(Permalink)
Seriously? If you and others insist on making this a political issue, then consider that the vast majority of 737 Max testing and evaluation went on during the Obama administration, which had been in charge of the FAA for the previous 8 years. In March 2017, the Trump administration had literally been in power for less than 2 months.
(Written on 2020年 10月 01日)(Permalink)
You are such a hyper-partisan poster. Do you not realize that corruption, i.e. politicians and bureaucrats looking the other way for campaign contributions and other forms of graft, goes on in *every* govt. and is not limited to any particular political party. But I don't believe that this Boeing disgrace has anything to do with corrupt politicians or administrations. Cutting the FAA budget by 1% cannot by itself reduce their effectiveness and negate their ability to do their job. What happened here is due to the age old problems with humanity like selfishness, greed, and incompetence, and it has nothing to do with what political party you belong to. Yes, I agree we need better oversight from the govt., but the ultimate quality control comes from the consumer. Boeing's sales of the 737 Max plummeted and the company has lost a huge amount of money over this. I really hope that a lot of the a**holes involved in this fiasco lose their jobs. Moreover, the FAA must be made more effective
(Written on 2020年 09月 17日)(Permalink)
您的浏览器不支持. 升级您的浏览器 |