Surely you were correct to state the lack of sufficient training with regards to the flight commander and the first officer. But as a pilot I would expect you to hold Boeing more responsible on the rush to put this bird into flight knowing fully well that the MCAS was an add on to hide the unusual potential for disaster due to the more powerful engines mounted higher thereby altering the airworthiness of the Max8. Also as a pilot you must also question the explicit ignoring of the MCAS in the Emergency manual. The fact that the pilot were ill trained IMO doesn't count: I would question any pilot flying this plane in the same flying conditions and recovering.

(Written on 2019年 11月 01日)(Permalink)

Suure, we learned as much from the Max 8, didn't we?

(Written on 2019年 09月 27日)(Permalink)

We get it, got it???

(Written on 2019年 09月 20日)(Permalink)

why no mention about MCAS in the emergency handbook??? Why no simulator training for all pilots and, WHY did the country of Brazil refuse to buy this bird? Just more questions.

(Written on 2019年 09月 20日)(Permalink)

Could nationalism play a part?? The good old U.S. vs. Airbus? Stay tuned is this bird gets turned down by foreign flying authorities. It ain't over yet.

(Written on 2019年 09月 20日)(Permalink)

Profits over people. Multiple sources on line paints the picture quite vividly. Leeham News is an excellent source to research issues about the Max 8.

(Written on 2019年 09月 20日)(Permalink)

Ignorance is bliss,isn't it?

(Written on 2019年 09月 20日)(Permalink)

Baloney. Please do some legitimate research.

(Written on 2019年 09月 20日)(Permalink)

Your post really takes the boob prize.

(Written on 2019年 09月 13日)(Permalink)

Is this all that you're capable of posting?

(Written on 2019年 09月 06日)(Permalink)