← Back to Squawk list

Bombardier launches 90 seat Q400 turboprop airliner

提交时间：8 年以前

Bombardier launched a 90 seat variant of its Q400 aircraft, making it the world’s only commercial turboprop capable of carrying 90 passengers. (www.aviationanalysis.net) 更多...

Sainulabid Pothangodan

20 条会员评论

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]

Ruger9X19 8 年以前 3

800 hours between A checks? I don't know weather to be scared or impressed.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

oowmmr 8 年以前 2

This morning I read Bombardier is laying of 7000 employees.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Claude B. 8 年以前 0

I just read yesterday Boeing will laying of from 4000 up to 8000 workers.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Claude B. 8 年以前 1

Plus 14,000 retirement on its way!

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Tony Smith 8 年以前 1

Really don't want to ever fly in one of these.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

dee9bee 8 年以前 1

Can you say 'tailstrike'? We'll see.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

dee9bee 8 年以前 1

I stand corrected, I see the outside dimensions will remain the same.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Claude B. 8 年以前 1

Perfect for Porter Air Line if it is impossible to have the CSeries there.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

scott8733 8 年以前 1

I'd consider 28" pitch corporal punishment for anyone over 5'-9". Perhaps the model designation should be " DVT 400"

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Kawaiipoint2 8 年以前 1

Strictly for a European low cost carrier market. Itll never fly in the US

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

Wolfgang Prigge 8 年以前 1

28" pitch is barely adequate for a school bus intended for primary schools.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

jwmson 8 年以前 1

28" pitch? "The cattle will please refrain from mooing."

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

michael dallaverde 8 年以前 0

Ewwwwww

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

michael dallaverde 8 年以前 -6

If an airline purchases this "New" product, it speaks volumes about what they think about their passengers. Sadly, this is a desperate attempt my bombardier to reignite a dieing product.

回复 ↓•永久链接•Report

DAL521 8 年以前 5

dying product?? The Q400 is the most successful Turboprop ever build! And they only making this move to increase the Seat capacity because there is a demand from airlines.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

michael dallaverde 8 年以前 0

Oh fun, I can argue that point any way you choose. Q vs. ATR? Q orders vs turbo jet. American airlines operating Q's...vs? Keep in mind I used to work for Bombardier...know a LOT about the Q program. Do you have a link citing the "most successful turboprop ever built"? Check the order logs...the plane is too expensive comparatively....we can review what Republic did with theirs? Your choice.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

Claude B. 8 年以前 1

It is faster then ATR.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

michael dallaverde 8 年以前 1

I don't deny the plane was successful. I'm arguing its on its last leg. All great planes suffer this inevitable fate. 727, MD-80s, CRJ-200, sadly....the 747...Very sad. I wish they'd bring back the older dash-8s...(100 they 300) personally.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report

DAL521 8 年以前 2

I have read "the most successful Turboprop ever build" in a Magazine from my home Airport some times ago, okay could be also some promotional lie. But any way, for me it is the best Turboprop, many airlines have chosen the Q400 in the last years especially Asian Airlines. But your right all great planes suffer this fate, it seems so that quality means nothing today it's only about god dam'n money.

回复 ↓•永久链接•父级•Report